group theory
Lagrange's Theorem
You should know: subgroups
Overview
Lagrange's theorem states that for any finite group G and any subgroup H of G, the order of H divides the order of G, with the quotient |G|/|H| equal to the index [G:H], the number of distinct cosets of H. The proof is a clean counting argument: the cosets of H partition G into equal-sized blocks. Named after Joseph-Louis Lagrange, who proved a special case for permutation groups before the group concept was formalized, this theorem is one of the most heavily used facts in finite group theory — it instantly rules out many possible subgroup orders.
Intuition
The left cosets of H — sets of the form gH — partition G into non-overlapping blocks that are all exactly the same size as H (the map h ↦ gh is a bijection from H to gH). Since G is chopped up into some number of equal-size blocks, that number of blocks times the block size must equal |G|, forcing |H| to divide |G|. It's the same reasoning as noting that if you can perfectly tile a rectangle of area 12 with identical tiles, the tile's area must divide 12.
Formal Definition
Let G be a finite group and H ≤ G a subgroup. Then:
Worked Examples
By Lagrange's theorem, any subgroup order must divide 15.
The divisors of 15 = 3 × 5 are 1, 3, 5, 15.
Answer: Possible subgroup orders are exactly 1, 3, 5, and 15.
Practice Problems
A group has order 20. Which of the following CANNOT be the order of a subgroup?
Show that a group G of prime order p has no nontrivial proper subgroups.
In a group of order 12, what must be true about the order of any single element a ∈ G?
Quiz
Summary
- For finite G and subgroup H ≤ G: |G| = [G:H]·|H|, so |H| always divides |G|.
- Corollary: the order of every element of G divides |G|.
- The converse is false in general — not every divisor of |G| need be a realized subgroup order (e.g. A₄ has no subgroup of order 6).
Mathematics